4.5 Article

Sum-Frequency Vibrational Spectroscopic Study of the Cation-π Interaction: Amine and Guanidine

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c05709

关键词

-

资金

  1. NRF [2019R1A2C1004292, 2018R1A6A1A03024940]
  2. Korea Basic Science Institute (National Research Facilities and Equipment Center) [2020R1A6C101A192]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020R1A6C101A192, 2019R1A2C1004292] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cation-z interaction plays important roles in biology, and this study investigates the interaction between ODG/ODA and phenol/indole, revealing their effects on stability and structure in water.
The cation-z interaction is an interaction between a positively charged cation and z electrons in an aromatic group of a molecule. It is considered to play key roles in signal transduction, stabilization of the protein structure, enzyme catalysis in biology, and wet adhesion and biomolecular condensation. In this study, octadecylguanidine hydrochloride (ODG) and octadecylamine (ODA) having guanidine and amine headgroups, respectively, are found to interact with z molecules (phenol or indole) as investigated by sum-frequency vibrational spectroscopy. ODG is unstable and does not form a neat monolayer on the water surface. However, after adding z molecules into subphase water, it becomes more stable against dissolution as evidenced by the appearance of its CHx peaks and a CH peak of the aromatic ring in the sum-frequency spectrum. Unlike ODG, ODA forms a stable monolayer on the water surface at a neutral pH. After adding z molecules into the solution, the amine-z interaction promotes the protonation of the amine headgroup and the penetration of the z molecules makes the ODA monolayer more disordered. Indole is found to be more effective in binding with the ODG as compared to phenol.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据