4.5 Article

Modeling of the Electrostatic Interaction and Catalytic Activity of [NiFe] Hydrogenases on a Planar Electrode

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 126, 期 43, 页码 8777-8790

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c05371

关键词

-

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (Mexico) [PIA/APOYO AFB180002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study uses computational methods to determine the possible orientations of [NiFe] hydrogenase on a planar electrode and finds that the solution's salinity and pH have significant effects on the orientation.
Hydrogenases are a group of enzymes that have caught the interest of researchers in renewable energies, due to their ability to catalyze the redox reaction of hydrogen. The exploitation of hydrogenases in electrochemical devices requires their immobilization on the surface of suitable electrodes, such as graphite. The orientation of the enzyme on the electrode is important to ensure a good flux of electrons to the catalytic center, through an array of iron-sulfur dusters. Here we present a computational approach to determine the possible orientations of a [NiFe] hydrogenase (PDB le3d) on a planar electrode, as a function of pH, salinity, and electrode potential. The calculations are based on the solution of the linearized Poisson- Boltzmann equation, using the PyGBe software. The results reveal that electrostatic interactions do not truly immobilize the enzyme on the surface of the electrode, but there is instead a dynamic equilibrium between different orientations. Nonetheless, after averaging over all thermally accessible orientations, we find significant differences related to the solution's salinity and pH, while the effect of the electrode potential is relatively weak. We also combine models for the protein adsoption-desorption equilibria and for the electron transfer between the proteins and the electrode to arrive at a prediction of the electrode's activity as a function of the enzyme concentration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据