4.6 Article

High photocatalytic activity of aerogel tetragonal and monoclinic ZrO2 samples

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2022.113970

关键词

Tetragonal ZrO 2; Monoclinic ZrO 2; Sol; gel ?one; pot ?; Aerogel; Structural defects

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ZrO2 nanoparticles were prepared using a 'one-pot' sol-gel method followed by thermal post-treatments, allowing the creation of intermediary band gap sites and enabling photocatalytic activity under UV irradiation. The photoactivity of ZrO2 samples is dependent on the mid band gap value, which can be influenced by the ZrO2 phase, surface oxygen defects, and lattice distortion at high temperatures. Further research is warranted to explore the implications of these findings.
ZrO2 nanoparticles have been investigated in the photodegradation of formic acid under UV irradiation. ZrO2 photocatalysts were prepared using a 'one-pot' sol-gel method followed by drying under supercritical conditions of solvent and calcination at temperatures varying between 400 degrees C and 800 degrees C. Samples were characterized by adsorption-desorption isotherms, XRD, Thermal analysis, Raman spectroscopy, HRTEM, DRS, PL and XPS. The aerogel preparation allows the creation of intermediate band gap states making it active under UV irradiation. The photoactivity of ZrO2 samples follow the order; ZrO2 400 >= ZrO2 800 > ZrO2 700 > ZrO2 500 > ZrO2 600 in agreement with their optical properties. The lower the value of mid band gap, the higher the photocatalytic activity. The value of mid band gap depends on the nature of the ZrO2 phase (tetragonal or monoclinic), surface oxygen defects and the tendency to lattice distortion for samples treated at high temperature. This study therefore shows for the first time that adequate preparation of oxide materials (here ZrO2) allows finely tuning the creation of intermediary band gap sites through thermal post-treatments making ZrO2, a large band gap material, able to photocatalytically work under UV irradiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据