4.6 Article

Solar light induced photocatalytic degradation of sulfamethoxazole by ZnWO4/CNNs nanocomposites

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2022.114108

关键词

Solar light photocatalytic activity; Zinc tungstates; Carbon nitride nanosheets; Nanocomposites; Sulfamethoxazole; Stability

资金

  1. EIT Raw Materials Programme IDEAL [19040]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ZnWO4/CNNs nanocomposites were successfully prepared through a simple method at room temperature. The optimum loading of carbon nitride nanosheets (CNNs) for the formation of the nanocomposites was investigated, and it was found that the material with 30 wt% ZnWO4/CNNs exhibited the higher photocatalytic activity. The photocatalytic mechanism was found to be mainly driven by photogenerated holes and superoxides.
The preparation of ZnWO4/CNNs nanocomposites was achieved through a simple method at room temperature. In order to investigate the optimum loading of carbon nitride nanosheets (CNNs) for the formation of the nanocomposites, a series of ZnWO4/CNNs compositions were prepared and studied through a variety of characterization techniques, such as powder X-ray diffractrometry (pXRD), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and UV-vis optical measurements. The photocatalytic activity of the nanocomposites was investigated by using sulfamethoxazole (SMX) as a model pollutant. It was found that the material with 30 wt% ZnWO4/CNNs exhibited the higher photocatalytic activity. The photocatalytic mechanism was further investigated using appropriate scavengers (t-ButOH, Kl) or under Argon atmosphere to examine the contribution of the different reactive species in the observed photocatalytic activity. The photogenerated holes and the superoxides produced following the promotion of electrons to the conduction band were the main responsible for pollutant's degradation. The photocatalytic efficiency after five sequential experiments showed only a slightly decreased implied high stability of the synthesized material.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据