4.6 Review

Deep learning for automated epileptiform discharge detection from scalp EEG: A systematic review

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING
卷 19, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac9644

关键词

epilepsy; deep learning; interictal epileptiform discharges; automation; electroencephalogram

资金

  1. Graduate Research Industry Scholarship (GRIP) at Monash University, Australia
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council [GNT1183119, GNT1160815, APP1163708]
  3. Epilepsy Foundation
  4. University of Melbourne
  5. Monash University
  6. Brain Australia
  7. Norman Beischer Medical Research Foundation
  8. Weary Dunlop Medical Research Foundation
  9. Medical Research Future Fund Practitioner Fellowship [MRF1136427]
  10. Monash RTP Stipend Scholarship
  11. Epilepsy Foundation of America

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Automated interictal epileptiform discharge (IED) detection has been extensively studied using machine learning methods, particularly deep learning (DL). While DL shows promising results in IED detection, there are limitations in standardizing data collection, multi-center testing, and reporting of clinically relevant metrics.
Automated interictal epileptiform discharge (IED) detection has been widely studied, with machine learning methods at the forefront in recent years. As computational resources become more accessible, researchers have applied deep learning (DL) to IED detection with promising results. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of the current DL approaches to automated IED detection from scalp electroencephalography (EEG) and establish recommendations for the clinical research community. We conduct a systematic review according to the PRISMA guidelines. We searched for studies published between 2012 and 2022 implementing DL for automating IED detection from scalp EEG in major medical and engineering databases. We highlight trends and formulate recommendations for the research community by analyzing various aspects: data properties, preprocessing methods, DL architectures, evaluation metrics and results, and reproducibility. The search yielded 66 studies, and 23 met our inclusion criteria. There were two main DL networks, convolutional neural networks in 14 studies and long short-term memory networks in three studies. A hybrid approach combining a hidden Markov model with an autoencoder was employed in one study. Graph convolutional network was seen in one study, which considered a montage as a graph. All DL models involved supervised learning. The median number of layers was 9 (IQR: 5-21). The median number of IEDs was 11 631 (IQR: 2663-16 402). Only six studies acquired data from multiple clinical centers. AUC was the most reported metric (median: 0.94; IQR: 0.94-0.96). The application of DL to IED detection is still limited and lacks standardization in data collection, multi-center testing, and reporting of clinically relevant metrics (i.e. F1, AUCPR, and false-positive/minute). However, the performance is promising, suggesting that DL might be a helpful approach. Further testing on multiple datasets from different clinical centers is required to confirm the generalizability of these methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据