4.6 Article

Novel series of 1,2,3-triazolyl-acetamide scaffolds: Synthesis, biological activity and computational molecular modeling

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
卷 1263, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.133068

关键词

1; 2; 3-Triazoles; Antibacterial activity; Molecular docking; Molecular properties; 2ZCS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel series of 1,2,3-triazolyl-acetamide derivatives were synthesized and their structures were confirmed by various analyses. The compounds exhibited strong antibacterial activity against different microorganisms, with compounds 9h, 9c, 9d, and 9i showing the most potent inhibitory effects on K. pneumoniae, S. aureus, S. pneumoniae, and E. coli, respectively. The study also explored the interaction between the compounds and a target protein, providing insights into the key active site and binding mode.
A novel series of 1,2,3-triazolyl-acetamide derivatives 9 were synthesizsed starting from N -(2,4-difluoro-3(methylthio)phenyl)but-3-ynamide and 2-azido- N -phenylacetamide. Structures of final compounds were confirmed by their 1 H NMR, 13 C NMR, IR, and mass spectral analysis. All new synthesised compounds were evaluated for their antibacterial activity against Gram ( + ve) and Gram (-ve) microorganisms. Antibacterial activity of compounds 9h, 9c, 9d, and 9i (MICs = 4.0, 3.8, 3.2, 6.7 mu g/mL) were the most potent inhibitory active against K. pneumoniae, S. aureus, S. pneumoniae, E. coli microorganisms respectively. We explored the probable key active site and binding mode interactions in carotenoid dehydrosqualene synthase from S. aureus complexed with bisphosphonate BPH-70 0 (2ZCS) protein and ligand 9i possesses highest hydrogen bonding amino acid interactions Ser21(2.86 A, 3.16 A), Lys17(2.91 A), Lys20(2.76 A), Lys17(2.13 A), Ser21(1.87 A). Scaffolds 9b, 9j and 9i exhibited highest potency with drug likeness score 0.84, 0.77 and 0.68 and processing Lipinski's rule of five as good oral bioavailability drugs.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据