4.6 Article

Imine-based highly polar achiral unsymmetrical four-ring bent shaped liquid crystals: Design, synthesis and characterization

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
卷 1267, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.133496

关键词

Bent-core liquid crystals; Polar; Achiral; Nematic phase; Orthogonal SmA phase

资金

  1. MHRD
  2. DST, Govt. of India [SB-1712004]
  3. University of Science & Technology Meghalaya (USTM), India
  4. SERB [CRG/2019/000901/OC]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a new series of nonchiral bent-shaped compounds incorporating two imines and one ester linkage in the molecular framework were designed and synthesized. It was found that certain compounds exhibited a stable and significantly longer range of nematic phase, while others showed different anisotropic phases.
Herein, we have designed and synthesized a new homologous series of polar achiral bent-shaped compounds incorporating two imines and one ester linkage in the molecular framework. It has been observed that a stable and significantly longer range of nematic phase was achieved for compound A5. The homologue A6 exhibited only nematic cybotactic and smectic A mesophase. The intermediate homologue A7 and A8 displayed nematic cybotactic as well as smectic A and an unknown smectic X phase. Compounds A10 to A14, bearing the longer alkyl chains, showed the ordered smectic A and smectic X phase. In the case of smectic A and smectic X phase limits, the number of correlated units (xi/d(SAXS)) was found to be around 20, while in the case of nematics, it ranged from 1-3. However, this value has been recorded up to nine correlated units in the case of cybotactic nematic ordering. All of these materials have a significantly high dipole moment of around similar to 10 Debye computed via Density Functional Theory calculations, which is essential for high dielectric materials and furthermore can stabilize the highly anticipated ferroelectric nematic phase. (C) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据