4.6 Article

Analysis of eight spider venom glands using Raman spectroscopy

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
卷 1263, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.133009

关键词

Raman spectromicroscopy; Spider; Venom gland; Classification

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foun-dation of China [11364001, 32160113]
  2. Key Project on Applied Basic Research of Yunnan Provincial Depart-ment of Science and Technology [2016FA012]
  3. Analysis and Testing Fundation of Kunming University of Sci-ence and Technology [2020P20191110 0 09]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, Raman microspectroscopy was used to analyze the secondary structure of proteins in spider venom. The venom glands were found to be a preferable alternative for venom research. By analyzing the Raman peaks and relative intensity ratios, the eight spider species could be preliminarily classified. Raman spectroscopy proved to be an effective and reliable method for studying spider venom glands.
Spider venom has high research value for use as an insecticide and drug, but its extraction is expensive and complicated. In this paper, Raman microspectroscopy was used to determine the secondary structure of the proteins, which are the active ingredients in venoms, and the venoms were obtained from eight spiders: Hippasa lycosina, Lycosa grahami, Lycosa wangi, Lycosa yunnanensis, Heteropoda venatoria, Psechrus ghecuanus, Macrothele yani and Macrothele yunnanica. The results indicate that venom glands are the preferred substitute for venom for research. Second, the eight glands have similar strongest Raman peaks, but there are partial differences in the weaker peaks and relative intensity ratios, and the differences can give a preliminary classification for the eight spiders. Third, Raman spectroscopy is an effective method with good repeatability and stability to study spider venom glands.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ )

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据