4.7 Article

Probing the supramolecular assembly in solid, solution and gel phase in uriede based thiazole derivatives and its potential application as iodide ion sensor

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
卷 362, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2022.119763

关键词

Low molecular organic gelators (LMOGs); Urea -based compounds; Small -angle neutron scattering (SANS); Gelation Mechanism; Anion sensing

资金

  1. Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Government of India, New Delhi [UGC-NFOBC-NFO-2018-19-OBC-GUJ-71717]
  2. DST -FIST, New Delhi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of thiazole-urea-aliphatic chain-based compounds were designed and synthesized using Crystal Engineering principles. These compounds showed excellent gelation ability in polar solvents. Physicochemical techniques were employed to investigate the packing of these compounds in solid-state, solution, and gel phases, revealing high sensitivity and selectivity of compound 1 to iodide ions.
A simple series of thiazole-urea-aliphatic chain-based compounds (1-7) were designed and synthesized using the principle of Crystal Engineering. The aliphatic alkyl chain of compounds was varied to obtain the delicate hydrophobic-hydrophilic balance between solute-solvent molecules required to attain the supramolecular gelation. Interestingly, all the compounds turned out to be excellent gelators for polar solvents including water mixtures with alcohols and acetonitrile. To get an insight into the packing of molecules in solid-state, solution, and gel phases various physicochemical techniques were employed such as SANS, SEM, PXRD, DFT calculation, etc. UV-Vis spectrometric measurements of compound 1 in the solution phase were carried out to establish the anion sensing capability. Very high sensitivity and selectivity of iodide ion in presence of other ions and degelation of acetonitrile gel of compound 1 in pres-ence of iodide salts, make these compounds a unique class of LMOGs. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据