4.7 Article

Investigation on the phase behaviors of aqueous surfactant two-phase systems containing Alkyl polyglucosides (APG) and alkyl polyglucoside sulfosuccinate (APGSS)

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
卷 368, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2022.120630

关键词

Aqueous surfactant; Two-phase system; Phase behavior; Aggregation behavior; Formation mechanism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The phase behaviors and formation mechanism of a surfactant aqueous two-phase system (ATPS) composed of a nonionic surfactant and an anionic surfactant were studied. The results showed that the top phase was enriched with the nonionic surfactant, while the bottom phase was enriched with the anionic surfactant. The micelle aggregation behaviors were explored using various measurements, and the formation mechanism of the ATPS was proposed.
The surfactant aqueous two-phase systems have been widely attention because of their mild conditions and easy recovery. The phase behaviors and formation mechanism of an aqueous surfactant two-phase system (ATPS), which was composed of a nonionic surfactant Alkyl polyglucosides (APG) and an anionic surfactant sodium alkyl polyglucoside sulfosuccinate (APGSS), were studied. The phase diagram for APG/ APGSS ATPS was illustrated. Merchuk relation was used to correlate the binodal experimental data. Indicating that top phase is APG enriched phase and the bottom phase is APGSS enriched. By measure-ments of surface tension, electrical conductivity, density, viscosity, transmission electron microscopy, and dynamic light scattering, micelle aggregation behaviors were explored. The formation mechanism of the ATPS was also proposed, which is attributed to the different aggregation behaviors between APG and APGSS molecules leads to different micelle size and morphology. The top phase flocculates due to the presence of asymmetric larger wormlike aggregates, lead to phase separation and the forma-tion of the ATPS. (c) 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据