4.4 Article

Pacific Biosciences Fusion and Long Isoform Pipeline for Cancer Transcriptome-Based Resolution of Isoform Complexity

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS
卷 24, 期 12, 页码 1292-1306

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2022.09.003

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Molecular profiling using long-read sequencing improves the resolution of structural variations in cancer and enables the discovery of new expressed fusion partners and the analysis of complex intragenic alterations.
Genomic profiling using short-read sequencing has utility in detecting disease-associated variation in both DNA and RNA. However, given the frequent occurrence of structural variation in cancer, molecular profiling using long-read sequencing improves the resolution of such events. For example, the Pacific Biosciences long-read RNA-sequencing (Iso-Seq) transcriptome protocol provides full-length isoform characterization, discernment of allelic phasing, and isoform discovery, and identifies expressed fusion partners. The Pacific Biosciences Fusion and Long Isoform Pipeline (PB_FLIP) incorporates a suite of RNA-sequencing software analysis tools and scripts to identify expressed fusion partners and isoforms. In addition, sequencing of a commercial reference (Spike-In RNA Variants) with known isoform complexity was performed and demonstrated high recall of the Iso-Seq and PB_FLIP workflow to benchmark our protocol and analysis performance. This study describes the utility of Iso-Seq and PB_FLIP analysis in improving deconvolution of complex structural variants and isoform detection within an institutional pediatric and adolescent/young adult translational cancer research cohort. The exemplar case studies demonstrate that Iso-Seq and PB_FLIP discover novel expressed fusion partners, resolve complex intragenic alterations, and discriminate between allele-specific expression profiles. (J Mol Diagn 2022, 24: 1292-1306; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2022.09.003)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据