4.7 Article

Impacts of lipids on the performance of anaerobic membrane bioreactors for food wastewater treatment

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 666, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.121104

关键词

Anaerobic membrane bioreactor; Food wastewater; Lipids; Volatile fatty acids; Microbial community structure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the resistance of anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) to lipid gradients during food wastewater treatment. The results showed that AnMBR could adapt to a certain content of lipids by stimulating biomass growth and activity. However, a further increase in lipid dosage led to system failure and inhibited methane production.
This study investigated the resistance of anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) to lipid gradients during food wastewater treatment. Sodium oleate (oleate-Na) was added to synthetic food wastewater to simulate lipids. Results show that AnMBR could adapt to a certain content of lipids by stimulate biomass growth and activity. As the dosage of oleate-Na increased from 0 to 2 g/L, the removal of total organic carbon (TOC) decreased for several days and then recovered back to above 90%. Such a decrease and increase profile was also observed for biogas production and methane yield, which stabilized at 0.61 and 0.41 L/gCOD, respectively, after oleate-Na addition was maintained at 2 g/L for 13 days. Nevertheless, further addition of 4 g/L oleate-Na led to system failure with a reduction of TOC removal and biogas production from 92% to 62% and from 0.61 L/gCOD to 0.083 L/gCOD, respectively, given a significant accumulation of volatile fatty acids to 2940 mg/L. Further mi-crobial analysis showed that the genus Methanosaeta enriched to 50% with 2 g/L oleate-Na addition and thus contributed to the recovery of methane production. By contrast, adding 4 g/L oleate-Na inhibited the prolifer-ation of the genus Methanosarcina to reduce organic biodegradation and then methane production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据