4.7 Article

Suppression of radical attack in polymer electrolyte membranes using a vinyl polymer blend interlayer with low oxygen permeability

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 658, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120734

关键词

Fuel cell; Polymer electrolyte membrane; Oxygen permeability; Polyvinyl alcohol; OCV holding Test

资金

  1. Toyota Mobility Foundation
  2. Center of Innovation Science and Technology based Radical Innovation and Entrepreneurship Program (COI Program), JST Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By sandwiching a high oxygen barrier interlayer between two Nafion 211 membranes, radical formation in PEFC can be effectively reduced, improving its chemical durability.
Decomposition of polymer electrolyte membranes (PEMs) by radical species is a significant issue related to the chemical durability of polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEFCs). A major contributor to radical formation is the oxygen crossover through the membrane from cathode to anode. Therefore, suppression of oxygen diffusion through the PEM is predicted to effectively mitigate the chemical degradation via radical formation. To confirm this, a simple high oxygen barrier PEM is prepared by sandwiching a thin gas barrier interlayer in between two Nafion 211 membranes. The interlayer consists of poly (vinyl alcohol) (PVA) and poly (vinyl sulfonic acid) (PVS) with various molar ratio. The sandwich PEM can show 286 times lower oxygen permeability than Nafion 212 membrane, which corresponds to 1.7 times longer survival time than Nafion 212 in a chemically accelerated stress test for PEMs known as open circuit voltage (OCV) holding test. Furthermore, the SEM image of the sandwich PEM cross-section shows that the interlayer could survive the OCV holding test despite its lower resistance against radical attack. The results in this study indicate that the addition of high oxygen barrier interlayer can reduce radical formation in PEFC and improve chemical durability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据