4.3 Article

Novel Borrelia Genotypes from Brazil Indicate a New Group of Borrelia spp. Associated with South American Bats

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY
卷 60, 期 1, 页码 213-217

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jme/tjac160

关键词

Caatinga; Ceara; Desmodus rotundus; Spirochete; tick-borne diseases

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A potentially novel Borrelia organism was detected in vampire bats from the Brazilian semiarid region, forming a monophyletic group with a Borrelia associated with a Colombian bat. This discovery suggests an independent event in the evolutionary history of Borrelia in bats.
The bacterial genus Borrelia comprises vector-borne spirochetes that have been classified into three major groups: the relapsing fever group (RFG), the Borrelia burgdorferi Johnson, Schmid, Hyde, Steigerwalt & Brenner sensu lato group (Bbsl), and the reptile-monotreme group (RMG). All three groups have been associated mainly with ticks and wild animals, especially rodents, birds, and reptiles. Here, we searched for Borrelia infection among 99 vampire bats [Desmodus rotundus (e. Geoffroy)] (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) from the Brazilian semiarid region. Through molecular investigation of bat internal organs, haplotypes of a potentially novel Borrelia organism were detected in 5% (5/99) of the bats. Borrelia DNA was detected in the liver, blood, spleen, kidney and brain, suggesting a systemic infection. Phylogenetic analyses inferred from partial sequences of the borrelial rrs and flaB genes indicated that the vampire bat-associated Borrelia sp. of this study form a monophyletic group with a newly reported Borrelia associated with a Colombia bat, distinct from the three main currently recognized groups of Borrelia spp., Bbsl, RFG, and RMG. These novel bat-associated Borrelia spp. from South America might have arisen through an independent event along the borrelial evolutionary history, since previous molecular reports of Borrelia organisms in bats or bat-associated ticks from Africa, Europe, and North America were all classified in the RFG.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据