4.5 Article

Global classical solutions of Keller-Segel-(Navier)-Stokes system with nonlinear motility functions

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2022.126272

关键词

Keller-Segel-Stokes system; Density-dependent motilities; Global boundedness; Weighted functional

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11601215]
  2. Shandong Provincial Science Foundation for Outstanding Youth [ZR2018JL005]
  3. Liaoning Province Education Administration [LJKZ1044]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper establishes the global existence of solutions for the Keller-Segel-(Navier)-Stokes system with nonlinear motility functions. The system describes a biological diffusion and chemotaxis process, taking into account possible diffusion degeneracy. Under certain conditions, it is proven that the system has a global classical solution for reasonable initial data.
This paper establishes the global existence of solutions to the following Keller-Segel-(Navier)-Stokes system with nonlinear motility functions {n(t) + u . del n = del . (gamma(c)del n - n phi(c)del c), x is an element of Omega, t > 0, c(t) + u . del c = d Delta c + n - c, x is an element of Omega, t > 0, (*) u(t) + kappa(u .del)u = Delta u + del P + n del phi, x is an element of Omega, t > 0, del . u = 0, x is an element of Omega, t > 0 in a bounded domain Omega subset of R-N (2 <= N <= 3) with smooth boundary, where the density-dependent motility functions gamma(c) and phi(c) denote the diffusive and chemotactic coefficients, respectively. The major technical difficulty in the analysis is the possible degeneracy of diffusion. Assume that N = 2, kappa not equal 0 or N = 3, kappa = 0. Then for all reasonably regular initial data, an associated no-flux type initial-boundary value problem (*) admits a global classical solution when gamma(c) > 0 and phi(c) > 0 are smooth on [0, infinity) and satisfy inf(c>0) d gamma(c)/c phi(c)(c phi(c) + d - gamma(c))(+) > N/2. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据