4.6 Article

Heterojunction CdS/CuO/ZnO branched nanowire photoelectrodes for efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10854-022-09255-w

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education and Training of Vietnam [B2021-DQN-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We reported a rational and simple approach to fabricate heterojunction CdS/CuO/ZnO branched nanowires as photoelectrodes for highly efficient water splitting. The optimized photoelectrode showed significantly enhanced photoconversion efficiency of 3.9% under solar simulation, which is much higher than other photoelectrodes.
Developing of novel photoelectrode materials with high durability and efficiency is a key step for practical realization of solar driven photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting. Herein, we report a rational and simple approach to fabricate heterojunction CdS/CuO/ZnO branched nanowires serving as the photoelectrodes with boosted PEC efficiency toward highly efficient water splitting. The ZnO branched nanowires were first hydrothermally synthesized from electrospun ZnO nanofibers followed by decorating of CuO nanoparticles via photoreduction. Finally, CdS nanoparticles were wrapped thoroughly the CuO/ZnO heterojuction by chemical bath deposition that form a socalled ternary core-shell structure. The optimized heterojunction CdS/CuO/ZnO branched nanowire photoelectrode displays a significantly enhanced photoconversion efficiency of 3.9% under solar simulation, which is 1.8, 18 and 30 times higher than that of the corresponding CdS/ZnO, CuO/ZnO and pristine ZnO branched nanowire photoelectrodes, respectively. The largest hydrogen production was measured to be 1.7 mL cm(-2) upon 3600 s exposure time, which is about 1.7 times greater than that of the CdS/ZnO electrode and in line with the one extrapolated from the PEC water splitting measurement. Our finding provides a rational strategy for the design of highly efficient and durable photoelectrodes for PEC water splitting process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据