4.6 Article

Effect of carbon content on the microstructure and properties of Cr-doped WC-15Co cemented carbide

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 57, 期 41, 页码 19327-19337

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-022-07826-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science and Technology on Transient Impact Laboratory Foundation [6142606193201]
  2. Special Funds for the Construction of Hunan Innovation Province [2019GK2052]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of carbon content on the microstructure, magnetic and mechanical properties, as well as corrosion behavior of WC-15Co-0.95Cr cemented carbide was systematically investigated. The results show that increasing carbon content promotes WC grain growth, but also leads to the precipitation of (Cr, W)Cx phase at the interface. The coercive force and Vickers hardness decrease with increasing carbon content, while the transverse rupture strength initially increases and then decreases. Higher carbon content cemented carbide exhibits poor corrosion resistance due to the precipitation of Cr-rich phase, resulting in the lack of Cr elements in the Co binder phase.
WC-15Co-0.95Cr cemented carbide with various carbon content was fabricated via sintering hot isostatic pressing. The influences of carbon content on the microstructure, magnetic and mechanical properties, as well as corrosion behavior, were systematically investigated. The results show that the increases in carbon contribute to WC grain growth. (Cr, W)Cx phase would precipitate at the interface while excessive carbon is added. The coercive force and Vickers hardness gradually decreased with carbon content added, while the transverse rupture strength initially increased and then decreased. The higher carbon content cemented carbide exhibits inferior corrosion resistance in the sodium sulfate solution. The poor corrosion resistance of higher carbon content cemented carbide primarily ascribes to the precipitation of Cr-rich phase, which gave rise to the lack of Cr elements in the Co binder phase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据