4.6 Article

Substituted polythiophene-based sensor for detection of ammonia in gaseous and aqueous environment

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 57, 期 37, 页码 17870-17882

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-022-07694-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic UCT Prague, CZ [402850061]
  2. Czech Science Foundation [22-14886S]
  3. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [8F21008]
  4. International Visegrad Fund [JP22420]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This manuscript presents the preparation and characterization of polymer layers on platinum electrodes using cyclic voltammetry. The response of the prepared polymers as active/sensitive media in two types of sensors was evaluated, and it was found that the nature of the substituent attached to the thiophene ring significantly affects the properties of the polymer layer.
This manuscript presents the preparation of polymer layers based on polythiophene (PTh) and its 3-substituted derivatives (substituents 4-(CH3O)C6H4 and 4-(CF3)C6H4 marked as PThOCH3 and PThCF3, respectively) on platinum electrodes by cyclic voltammetry (CV). The polymerization process and the morphology of resulting layers were discussed analysing of CV-voltammo-grams and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), respectively. Subsequently, the prepared polymers were tested as active/sensitive media of two types of sensors: (i) electrochemical sensor detecting ammonia in aqueous environment, whose response was evaluated by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS); (ii) chemiresistor detecting NH3 in atmosphere, whose response was evaluated by measurement of resistance. It was found that both the physical (morphology, homogeneity, relative thickness) and receptor properties of the polymer layer deposited on electrode surface are significantly affected by the nature of substituent attached to the thiophene ring. The mutual context of ammonia detection in both environments is discussed. [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据