4.5 Article

A Study on Effect of Multiple Laser Shock Peening on Microstructure, Residual Stress, and Mechanical Strength of 2.5 Ni-Cr-Mo (EN25) Low-Alloy Steel

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11665-022-07402-2

关键词

dislocation density; grain refinement; laser shock peening; residual stress; tensile strength; yield strength

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of multiple laser shock peening (LSP) on the microstructure, residual stress, and mechanical strength of EN25 steel were investigated. The results showed that LSP treatment could increase compressive residual stress and hardness on the surface, as well as improve yield strength and ultimate tensile strength.
The effect of multiple laser shock peening (LSP) on the microstructure, residual stress, and mechanical strength of 2.5 Ni-Cr-Mo, low-alloy steel (EN25) is investigated. LSP treatment is carried out for laser power density (LPD) in the range of 2.8 to 4.95 GW cm(-2) with different laser impacts and by maintaining an overlap of 70% and 58% along scanning direction and perpendicular directions, respectively. LSP-treated samples are characterized by residual stress, microstructural evolution, and mechanical strength. Single, double, and triple LSP treatments at 3.53 GW cm(-2) enhanced compressive residual stress at the surface by similar to - 520, similar to - 640, and similar to - 680 MPa compared to the as-received sample (- 100 MPa). In addition, for double and triple LSP impacts, the compressive residual stress is found at higher depths (850 and 965 mu m) than single LSP (660 mu m). XRD peak broadening analysis confirmed grain refinement and micro-strain in the LSP-treated samples. Further, the dislocation density increases with the number of laser impacts. As a result of microstructural refinement and creation of high dislocation density, the hardness in triple LSP-treated samples is increased by nearly 26% as compared to the unpeened one. Twenty percent improvement in yield strength and 12.5% improvement in ultimate tensile strength are observed in triple LSP-treated samples as compared to unpeened sample.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据