4.6 Article

Blocking Lipid Uptake Pathways Does not Prevent Toxicity in Adipose Triglyceride Lipase (ATGL) Deficiency

期刊

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
卷 63, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlr.2022.100274

关键词

CD36; dietary fat; lipid accumulation; lipotoxicity; storage diseases; LpL; lipid droplets; heart failure; myocardial lipid uptake; FA synthesis

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [HL45095, HL135987, HL73039]
  2. American Heart Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals that altering the diet and reducing cardiac lipid uptake cannot alleviate heart dysfunction and lipid accumulation caused by ATGL deficiency. Deleting lipid uptake pathways in ATGL-deficient mice also fails to improve heart dysfunction.
Lipid accumulation in nonadipose tissues can cause lipotoxicity, leading to cell death and se- vere organ dysfunction. Adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL) deficiency causes human neutral lipid stor- age disease and leads to cardiomyopathy; ATGL deficiency has no current treatment. One possible approach to alleviate this disorder has been to alter the diet and reduce the supply of dietary lipids and, hence, myocardial lipid uptake. However, in this study, when we supplied cardiac Atgl KO mice a low - or high-fat diet, we found that heart lipid accumula- tion, heart dysfunction, and death were not altered. We next deleted lipid uptake pathways in the ATGL- deficient mice through the generation of double KO mice also deficient in either cardiac lipoprotein lipase or cluster of differentiation 36, which is involved in an lipoprotein lipase-independent pathway for FA uptake in the heart. We show that neither deletion ameliorated ATGL-deficient heart dysfunction. Similarly, we determined that non-lipid-containing media did not prevent lipid accumulation by cultured myocytes; rather, the cells switched to increased de novo FA synthesis. Thus, we conclude that pathological storage of lipids in ATGL defi- ciency cannot be corrected by reducing heart lipid uptake.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据