4.3 Article

Performance of b-jet identification in the ATLAS experiment

期刊

JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/11/04/P04008

关键词

Large detector systems for particle and astroparticle physics; Large detector-systems performance; Pattern recognition, cluster finding, calibration and fitting methods; Performance of High Energy Physics Detectors

资金

  1. ANPCyT, Argentina
  2. YerPhI, Armenia
  3. ARC, Australia
  4. BMWFW, Austria
  5. FWF, Austria
  6. ANAS, Azerbaijan
  7. SSTC, Belarus
  8. CNPq, Brazil
  9. FAPESP, Brazil
  10. NSERC, Canada
  11. NRC, Canada
  12. CFI, Canada
  13. CERN
  14. CONICYT, Chile
  15. CAS, China
  16. MOST, China
  17. NSFC, China
  18. COLCIENCIAS, Colombia
  19. MSMT CR Czech Republic
  20. MPO CR Czech Republic
  21. VSC CR, Czech Republic
  22. DNRF Denmark
  23. DNSRC, Denmark
  24. Lundbeck Foundation, Denmark
  25. IN2P3-CNRS, France
  26. CEA-DSM/IRFU, France
  27. GNSF, Georgia
  28. BMBF, Germany
  29. HGF, Germany
  30. MPG, Germany
  31. GSRT, Greece
  32. RGC, China
  33. Hong Kong SAR, China
  34. ISF, Israel
  35. I-CORE, Israel
  36. Benoziyo Center, Israel
  37. INFN, Italy
  38. MEXT, Japan
  39. JSPS, Japan
  40. CNRST, Morocco
  41. FOM, Netherlands
  42. NWO, Netherlands
  43. RCN, Norway
  44. MNiSW, Poland
  45. NCN, Poland
  46. FCT, Portugal
  47. MNE/IFA, Romania
  48. MES of Russia
  49. NRC KI, Russian Federation
  50. JINR
  51. MESTD, Serbia
  52. MSSR, Slovakia
  53. ARRS, Slovenia
  54. MIZS, Slovenia
  55. DST/NRF, South Africa
  56. MINECO, Spain
  57. SRC, Sweden
  58. Wallenberg Foundation, Sweden
  59. SERI, Geneva, Switzerland
  60. SNSF, Geneva, Switzerland
  61. Cantons of Bern, Geneva, Switzerland
  62. MOST, Taiwan
  63. TAEK, Turkey
  64. STFC, United Kingdom
  65. DOE, United States of America
  66. NSF, United States of America
  67. BCKDF
  68. Canada Council
  69. CANARIE
  70. CRC
  71. Compute Canada
  72. FQRNT
  73. Ontario Innovation Trust, Canada
  74. EPLANET
  75. ERC
  76. FP7
  77. Horizon 2020
  78. Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions
  79. European Union
  80. Investissements d'Avenir Labex and Idex
  81. ANR
  82. Region Auvergne and Fondation Partager le Savoir, France
  83. DFG, Germany
  84. AvH Foundation, Germany
  85. EU-ESF
  86. Greek NSRF
  87. BSF
  88. GIF
  89. Minerva, Israel
  90. BRF, Norway
  91. Royal Society
  92. Leverhulme Trust, United Kingdom
  93. ICREA Funding Source: Custom
  94. Science and Technology Facilities Council [1090338, 1093272, ST/N000331/1, 1366825, PP/E000444/1, GRIDPP, ST/N000463/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  95. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  96. Division Of Physics [1119200] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  97. Division Of Physics
  98. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1410972, 1506173] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The identification of jets containing b hadrons is important for the physics programme of the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider. Several algorithms to identify jets containing b hadrons are described, ranging from those based on the reconstruction of an inclusive secondary vertex or the presence of tracks with large impact parameters to combined tagging algorithms making use of multi-variate discriminants. An independent b-tagging algorithm based on the reconstruction of muons inside jets as well as the b-tagging algorithm used in the online trigger are also presented. The b-jet tagging efficiency, the c-jet tagging efficiency and the mistag rate for light flavour jets in data have been measured with a number of complementary methods. The calibration results are presented as scale factors defined as the ratio of the efficiency (or mistag rate) in data to that in simulation. In the case of b jets, where more than one calibration method exists, the results from the various analyses have been combined taking into account the statistical correlation as well as the correlation of the sources of systematic uncertainty.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据