4.8 Article

Non-invasive tests for clinically significant portal hypertension after HCV cure

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
卷 77, 期 6, 页码 1573-1585

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.08.025

关键词

HVPG; hepatic venous pressure gradient; CSPH; LSM; liver stiffness measurement; transient elastography; platelet count; NIT; chronic hepatitis C; sus-tained virologic response; SVR; aetiological cure

资金

  1. Medical Scientific Fund of the Major of the City of Vienna [17035]
  2. European Association for the Study of the Liver

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed the diagnostic and prognostic value of non-invasive tests for portal hypertension in patients who have been cured of HCV infection. The results showed that liver stiffness measurement had an increased correlation with hepatic venous pressure gradient after treatment.
Background & Aims: Non-invasive tests (NITs) for clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH; hepatic venous pressure gradient [HVPG] >-10 mmHg) have predominantly been studied in patients with active HCV infection. Investigations after HCV cure are limited and have yielded conflicting results. We conducted a pooled analysis to determine the diagnostic/prognostic utility of liver stiffness measurement (LSM)/platelet count (PLT) in this setting. Methods: A total of 418 patients with pre-treatment HVPG >- 6 mmHg who achieved sustained virological response (SVR) and underwent post-treatment HVPG measurement were assessed, of whom 324 (HVPG/NIT-cohort) also had paired data on pre-/post-treatment LSM/PLT. The derived LSM/PLT criteria were then validated against the direct endpoint decompensation in 755 patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) with SVR (cACLD-validation-cohort). Results: HVPG/NIT-cohort: Among patients with cACLD, the pre-/post-treatment prevalence of CSPH was 80%/54%. The correlation between LSM/HVPG increased from pre- to posttreatment (r = 0.45 vs. 0.60), while that of PLT/HVPG remained unchanged. For given LSM/PLT values, HVPG tended to be lower

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据