4.5 Article

Primal-dual splittings as fixed point iterations in the range of linear operators

期刊

JOURNAL OF GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION
卷 85, 期 4, 页码 847-866

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10898-022-01237-w

关键词

Convex optimization; Douglas-Rachford splitting; Krasnosel'skii-Mann iterations; Monotone operator theory; Primal-dual algorithm; Quasinonexpansive operators

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we study the convergence of the relaxed primal-dual algorithm with critical preconditioners for solving composite monotone inclusions in real Hilbert spaces. It is proven that this algorithm defines Krasnosel'skii-Mann (KM) iterations in the range of a particular monotone self-adjoint linear operator with non-trivial kernel. The convergence result is a generalization of a previous theorem and is based on the convergence of KM iterations defined in the range of linear operators under certain conditions. The Douglas-Rachford splitting (DRS) is shown to be a particular instance of the primal-dual algorithm with critical preconditioners, and classical results are recovered from this perspective.
In this paper we study the convergence of the relaxed primal-dual algorithm with critical preconditioners for solving composite monotone inclusions in real Hilbert spaces. We prove that this algorithm define Krasnosel'skii-Mann (KM) iterations in the range of a particular monotone self-adjoint linear operator with non-trivial kernel. Our convergence result generalizes (Condat in J Optim Theory Appl 158: 460-479, 2013, Theorem 3.3) and follows from that of KM iterations defined in the range of linear operators, which is a real Hilbert subspace under suitable conditions. The Douglas-Rachford splitting (DRS) with a non-standard metric is written as a particular instance of the primal-dual algorithm with critical preconditioners and we recover classical results from this new perspective. We implement the algorithm in total variation reconstruction, verifying the advantages of using critical preconditioners and relaxation steps.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据