4.4 Article

Potential origins of fish toti-like viruses in invertebrates

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENERAL VIROLOGY
卷 103, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/jgv.0.001775

关键词

Piscine myocarditis virus; sea lice; Totiviridae; virus transmission

资金

  1. Marine Institute Cullen fellowship
  2. [CF/17/04/01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Totiviridae virus family, originally believed to infect only fungi and protists, has been found in increasing numbers in invertebrates and fish since 2006. These viruses pose new threats to aquaculture, particularly to whiteleg shrimp and Atlantic salmon. Research suggests that fish toti-like viruses may have originated from arthropod hosts.
The virus family Totiviridae had originally been considered to include only viruses which infected fungal and protist hosts, but since 2006 a growing number of viruses found in invertebrates and fish have been shown to cluster phylogenetically within this family. These Totiviridae-like, or toti- like, viruses do not appear to belong within any existing genera of Totiviridae, and whilst a number of new genus names have been suggested, none has yet been universally accepted. Within this growing number of toti-like viruses from animal hosts, there exists emerging viral threats particularly to aquaculture, namely Infectious myonecrosis virus in whiteleg shrimp and Piscine myocarditis virus (PMCV) in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). PMCV in particular continues to be an issue in salmon aquaculture as a number of questions remain unanswered about how the virus is transmitted and the route of entry into host fish. Using a phylogenetic approach, this study shows how PMCV and the other fish toti- like viruses probably have deeper origins in an arthropod host. Based on this, it is hypothesized that sea lice could be acting as a vector for PMCV, as seen with other RNA viruses in Atlantic salmon aquaculture and in the toti- like Cucurbit yellows-associated virus which is spread by the greenhouse whitefly Trialeurodes vaporariorum.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据