4.2 Review

Mutation and selection processes regulating short tandem repeats give rise to genetic and phenotypic diversity across species

期刊

JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
卷 36, 期 2, 页码 321-336

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.14106

关键词

short tandem repeats; microsatellites; DNA repair; selection; complex traits; evolution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Short tandem repeats (STRs) are short DNA units that repeat in a tandem fashion and contribute to genetic and phenotypic divergence. STRs have high mutation rates, leading to frequent copy number changes and a wide range of alleles. Recent advancements in sequencing technology, genome assemblies, and bioinformatics methods have allowed for more systematic study of STR variation across species. This review explores the mutation and selection processes affecting STR copy number evolution, as well as functional and adaptive changes linked to STRs.
Short tandem repeats (STRs) are units of 1-6 bp that repeat in a tandem fashion in DNA. Along with single nucleotide polymorphisms and large structural variations, they are among the major genomic variants underlying genetic, and likely phenotypic, divergence. STRs experience mutation rates that are orders of magnitude higher than other well-studied genotypic variants. Frequent copy number changes result in a wide range of alleles, and provide unique opportunities for modulating complex phenotypes through variation in repeat length. While classical studies have identified key roles of individual STR loci, the advent of improved sequencing technology, high-quality genome assemblies for diverse species, and bioinformatics methods for genome-wide STR analysis now enable more systematic study of STR variation across wide evolutionary ranges. In this review, we explore mutation and selection processes that affect STR copy number evolution, and how these processes give rise to varying STR patterns both within and across species. Finally, we review recent examples of functional and adaptive changes linked to STRs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据