4.7 Article

Paired denitrifying bioreactors with wide orientation for increased drainage flow capacity

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 319, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115768

关键词

Denitrification; Nitrate; Subsurface drainage; Tile drainage; Woodchips

资金

  1. Illinois Nutrient Research and Education Council (IL NREC) [2017-4-360498-302]
  2. CESU [68-3A75-18-518 504, NR185A12XXXXC004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Denitrifying bioreactors are an effective way to reduce nitrate loads in subsurface agricultural drainage. The study examined the performance of paired bioreactors in a large field in Illinois, USA and found that increasing the cross-sectional area improved flow capture, while short hydraulic retention times (HRTs) limited nitrate removal efficiency.
Denitrifying bioreactors are a conservation drainage practice for reducing nitrate loads in subsurface agricultural drainage. Bioreactor hydraulic capacity is limited by cross-sectional area perpendicular to flow through the woodchip bed, with excess bypass flow untreated. Paired bioreactors with wide orientations were built in 2017 in Illinois, USA, to treat drainage from a relatively large 29 ha field. The paired design consisted of: a larger, Main bioreactor (LWD: 6.1 x 18.3 x 0.9 m) for treating base flow, and 2) a smaller, Booster bioreactor (7.8 x 13.1 x 0.9 m) receiving bypass flow from the Main bioreactor during periods of high flow. Over three years of monitoring, the paired bioreactor captured 84-92% of the annual drainage discharge which demonstrated an expanded cross-sectional area could improve bioreactor flow capture, even for a large drainage area. However, the paired bioreactors removed 6-28% of the annual N load leaving the field (1.8-5.6 kg N ha(-1) removed; 52-161 kg N), which was not a notable improvement compared to bioreactors treating smaller drainage areas. The design operated as intended at low annual flow-weighted hydraulic retention times (HRTs) of usually <2 h, but these short HRTs ultimately limited bioreactor nitrate removal efficiency. Daily HRTs of <= 2 h often resulted in nitrate flushing. The Main bioreactor had higher hydraulic loading as intended and was responsible for the majority of flow captured in each year although not always the most nitrate mass removal. The Booster bioreactor provided better nitrate removal than the Main at HRTs of 3.0-11.9 h, possibly due to its drying cycles which may have liberated more available carbon. This new design approach tested at the field-scale illustrated tradeoffs between greater flow capacity (via increased bioreactor width) and longer HRT (via increased length), given a consistent bioreactor surface footprint.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据