4.7 Article

Measuring the environmental sustainability of 2030 Agenda implementation in EU countries: How do different assessment methods affect results?

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 322, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116152

关键词

Environmental sustainability; Sustainable development goals; SDG Index; Distance measure; Progress measure; European union

资金

  1. Faculty of Economics and Administration, Masaryk University project [MUNI/A/1481/2021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One of the most significant global issues is the lack of environmental sustainability due to negative human actions. This paper compares the assessment of environmental sustainability in the EU-27 countries based on the environmental goals of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The results show substantial differences between countries in achieving these goals, highlighting the sensitivity of the evaluation to methodological approaches and indicators used.
One of the most significant issues worldwide is the lack of environmental sustainability which is mainly due to negative consequences of human actions. When considering sustainability, social and economic development is founded on a healthy environment. Without it, it is not possible to use natural resources efficiently and increase the quality of life. Our paper focuses on environmental sustainability by analysing the environmental Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) given by the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (2030 Agenda). The aim of this article is to compare assessment of the environmental sustainability of 2030 Agenda in the EU-27 countries through the three commonly used methods, using the two sets of indicators. We use SDG Index, Distance Measure, and Progress Measure, using the both world and European indicators. The results showed substantial differences between EU countries in achieving the environmental goals of 2030 Agenda. However, the country's results and rankings are shown to be very sensitive to the methodological approach and the indicators used. Evaluations revealed many discrepancies and inconsistencies that could lead to misguided conclusions regarding a country's political decision making.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据