4.7 Article

Approach to a fungal treatment of a biologically treated landfill leachate

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 322, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116085

关键词

Fungal treatment; Biodegradation; Leachate treatment; Fungal enzymes; Organic matter removal

资金

  1. Spanish MINECO [CTM 2015- 63864-R]
  2. Foundation for the Promotion of Applied Scientific Research and Technology in Asturias [FC-GRUPIN-IDI/2018/000127]
  3. Spanish MICINN [BES-2016-077963]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the use of P. chrysosporium to treat landfill leachate with high load of refractory compounds. The results showed that fungal treatment was effective in reducing COD and color. pH control was crucial for the treatment, and the addition of carbon and nitrogen sources improved the removal efficiency.
White-rot fungi (WRF) have the ability to synthetize extracellular enzymes that could degrade recalcitrant pollutants. The aim of this work was to evaluate the use of P. chrysosporium to treat a biologically and physically pre-treated landfill leachate which high load of refractory compounds (COD > 1000 mg/L, BOD5 < 50 mg/L) in order to reduce COD and colour. Batch tests were carried out at 26 ? and 135 rpm for 15 days. The soluble chemical oxygen demand (sCOD), soluble biological oxygen demand (sBOD(5)) and colour, as well as the lignin peroxidase (LiP) and manganese peroxidase (MnP) enzymatic activities were analysed. Besides, the effects of different operating conditions, i.e., pH control, permeate dilution and supplementation, on treatment efficacy were investigated. The control of pH was shown to be key for fungal treatment. In addition, it was found that the addition of carbon and nitrogen sources improved the enzymatic synthesis and the removals of sCOD and colour. Data here obtained open the possibility of using fungi for reducing the amount of recalcitrant pollutants still present in treated landfill leachates or similar effluents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据