4.4 Article

Physics-Informed Neural Network Solution of Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical Processes in Porous Media

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS
卷 148, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0002156

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the application of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to the forward solution of thermo-hydro-mechanical (THM) problems in porous media. To address the challenges of multiphysics problems, the researchers propose dimensionless governing equations, a sequential training strategy, and adaptive weight strategies.
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have received increased interest for forward, inverse, and surrogate modeling of problems described by partial differential equations (PDEs). However, their application to multiphysics problem, governed by several coupled PDEs, presents unique challenges that have hindered the robustness and widespread applicability of this approach. Here we investigate the application of PINNs to the forward solution of problems involving thermo-hydro-mechanical (THM) processes in porous media that exhibit disparate spatial and temporal scales in thermal conductivity, hydraulic permeability, and elasticity. In addition, PINNs are faced with the challenges of the multiobjective and nonconvex nature of the optimization problem. To address these fundamental issues, we (1) rewrote the THM governing equations in dimensionless form that is best suited for deep learning algorithms, (2) propose a sequential training strategy that circumvents the need for a simultaneous solution of the multiphysics problem and facilitates the task of optimizers in the solution search, and (3) leveraged adaptive weight strategies to overcome the stiffness in the gradient flow of the multiobjective optimization problem. Finally, we applied this framework to the solution of several synthetic problems in one and two dimensions. (C) 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据