4.7 Article

Effect of fluoroethylene carbonate additive on the low-temperature performance of lithium-ion batteries

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116870

关键词

Fluoroethylene carbonate; Lithium-ion battery; Low-temperature additive; Lithium cobalt-acid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effect of adding fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) on LCO/Li cells in lithium-ion batteries. The results showed that FEC addition can form a thin and stable cathode-electrolyte interface film, reducing polarization and increasing discharge capacity. This is attributed to the formation of LiF component from FEC electrochemistry, which has low interfacial resistance and improved ionic conductivity.
The operation of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) at low temperature is hampered by decreased electrical conduc-tivity and delayed electrode reaction kinetics. Due to its positive solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) formation properties, fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) is one of the most widely researched additives for LIBs. Herein, charge-discharge tests, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy scanning electron microscopy (SEM), trans-mission electron microscopy (TEM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) were used to investigate the effect of FEC on LCO/Li cells. According to SEM, TEM and XPS results, the addition of FEC results in the formation of a thin and stable cathode-electrolyte interface (CEI) film on the surface of the LCO electrode. Charge-discharge curves show that adding FEC to the electrolyte reduces polarization while increasing the dis-charge capacity. At -40 degrees C, the discharge capacity in electrolyte with 10 wt% FEC is 75.3 % that at room tem-perature and only 46.8 % without FEC at 1C. LiF is the main component of the FEC electrochemistry that forms a CEI, which has a low interfacial resistance and improves the ionic conductivity of the electrolyte, thus facil-itating the performance of the battery at low temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据