4.3 Article

Influence of relative positions of the heat carrier and lateral canal opening on gutta- percha obturation of lateral canals in a three-dimensional-printed model

期刊

JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 9-16

出版社

ELSEVIER TAIWAN
DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2022.08.003

关键词

Lateral root canal; Micro-CT; Root canal obturation; Warm vertical compaction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to evaluate the influence of the relative positions of the heat carrier and lateral canal opening on gutta-percha obturation of lateral canals. The results showed that the relative positions of the heat carrier and lateral canal opening affect the obturation depth of gutta-percha.
Background/purpose: Effective filling of the lateral canals is of great significance in successful root canal treatment, but it is generally being challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of relative positions of the heat carrier and lateral canal opening on guttapercha obturation of lateral canals in a three-dimensional (3D)-printed model.Materials and methods: Thermal conductivity and real-time temperature transmission of gutta-percha were investigated using laser flash and thermal infrared analyses. 3D-printed root canal models with lateral canals at 1, 3, and 5 mm from the apex were fabricated, and different relative positions of the heat carrier were tested. The obturation process was recorded on video, and the obturation depth of the lateral canals was observed using X-ray micro-computed tomography.Results: Gutta-percha showed low thermal conductivity of 1.07 W/(m$K), and heating increased the temperature of gutta-percha above 60 degrees C only within 1 mm beyond the heat carrier tip. For lateral canals at 1 and 3 mm from the apex, gutta-percha penetrated further with deeper penetration of the heat carrier (P < 0.05). For 5-mm lateral canals, the heat carrier was always at apical level and the gutta-percha obturation depth was more at 2 mm apically than at 3 or 4 mm (P < 0.05).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据