4.7 Article

Synthesis and in vitro characterization of a novel S-protected thiolated alginate

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 124, 期 -, 页码 1-7

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.01.049

关键词

Alginate; S-protected thiomer; Preactivated thiomer; Mucoadhesion

资金

  1. University of Innsbruck
  2. FWF (Fonds zur Forderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung) [ZFP 235150]
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 23515] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The object of this study was to synthesize and characterize a novel S-protected thiolated polymer with a high degree of modification. In this regard, an alginate-cysteine and an alginate-cysteine-2-mercaptonicotinic acid conjugate were synthesized. To achieve a high coupling rate of the thiol group bearing ligand cysteine to the polymer, the carbohydrate was activated by an oxidative ring opening with sodium periodate followed by a reductive amination to bind the primary amino group of cysteine to resulting reactive aldehyde groups. The obtained thiolated polymer displayed 1561 +/- 130 mu mol thiol groups per gram polymer. About one third of these thiol groups were S-protected by the implementation of a thiol bearing aromatic protection group via disulfide bond formation. Test tablets of both modified polymers showed improved stability against oxidation in aqueous environment compared to the unmodified alginate and exhibit higher water-uptake capacity. Rheological investigations revealed an increased viscosity of the S-protected thiolated polymer whereat the thiolated non S-protected polymer showed gelling properties after the addition of hydrogen peroxide. The mucoadhesive properties could be improved significantly for both derivatives and no alteration in biocompatibility tested on Caco-2 cell monolayer employing an MTT assay could be detected after modification. According to these results, both new derivatives seem promising for various applications. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据