4.3 Article

Structure basis of CFTR folding, function and pharmacology

期刊

JOURNAL OF CYSTIC FIBROSIS
卷 22, 期 -, 页码 S5-S11

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2022.09.010

关键词

CFTR; ABC transporter; modulator; corrector; potentiator

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The loss of function of CFTR protein is the root cause of cystic fibrosis (CF), a common genetic disease. Recent advances in high-throughput drug screening and structural-biology studies have contributed to the development of effective CFTR modulators. This article provides an overview of CFTR folding, function, and pharmacology, with a focus on its first nucleotide-binding domain (NBD1). Understanding the molecular basis of CFTR can inspire the development of mutation-specific CFTR modulators.
The root cause of cystic fibrosis (CF), the most common life-shortening genetic disease in the Caucasian population, is the loss of function of the CFTR protein, which serves as a phosphorylation-activated, ATP-gated anion channel in numerous epithelia-lining tissues. In the past decade, high-throughput drug screening has made a significant stride in developing highly effective CFTR modulators for the treatment of CF. Meanwhile, structural-biology studies have succeeded in solving the high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) structure of CFTR in different conformations. Here, we provide a brief overview of some striking features of CFTR folding, function and pharmacology, in light of its specific structural features within the ABC-transporter superfamily. A particular focus is given to CFTR's first nucleotide-binding domain (NBD1), because folding of NBD1 constitutes a bottleneck in the CFTR protein biogenesis pathway, and ATP binding to this domain plays a unique role in the functional stability of CFTR. Unraveling the molecular basis of CFTR folding, function, and pharmacology would inspire the development of next-generation mutation-specific CFTR modulators. (C) 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Cystic Fibrosis Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据