4.6 Article

Natural Inflation with non minimal coupling to gravity in R2 gravity under the Palatini formalism

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/10/001

关键词

inflation; Inflation and CMBR theory; modified gravity

资金

  1. ICTP Senior Associate program
  2. CAS PIFI fellowship
  3. Humboldt Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study of Natural Inflation with non-minimal coupling to gravity in the context of extended gravity shows a significant improvement in the compatibility between theoretical results and observational constraints.
Natural Inflation with non-minimal coupling (NMC) to gravity, embodied by a Lagrangian term xi phi R-2, is investigated in the context of an extended gravity of the form R + alpha R-2. The treatment is performed in the Palatini formalism. We discuss various limits of the model alpha >> 1 and alpha << 1 in light of two scenarios of inflation: a Slow roll and a Constant roll scenario. By analyzing the observational consequences of the model, our results show a significant improvement regarding compatibility between the theoretical results of this model and the observational constraints from Planck 2018 and BICEP/Keck 2018, as exemplified by the tensor-to-scalar ratio and spectral index. Furthermore, a broader range for the parameter space of natural inflation is now compatible with the confidence contours of Planck & BICEP/Keck results. The joint effects of the contributions of both the NMC to gravity and the alpha R-2 make a significant improvement: alpha R-2 gravity influences scalar-tensor ratio values, whereas NMC to gravity has a more significant impact on the spectral index values. Contributions from both terms allow more previously excluded intervals to be included being compatible now with observational data. These conclusions about the roles of NMC to gravity and, particularly, the extended gravity remain mainly valid with a periodic NMC similar in form to the natural inflation potential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据