4.5 Article

Modeling Microtunnel Boring Machine Penetration Rate Using a Mechanistic Approach

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002402

关键词

Microtunneling; Penetration rate; Mechanistic approach; Microtunnel boring machine (MTBM)

资金

  1. Collaborative Research and Development Grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada [CRDPJ 532148]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study proposes a novel mechanistic approach based on contact mechanics theory to predict the productivity of microtunneling construction projects. By establishing a mechanistic relationship between the microtunnel boring machine (MTBM) penetration rate and its influential factors, the proposed approach provides important mechanistic insight.
Predicting the productivity of microtunneling construction projects is challenging, due to the complexities of this trenchless excavation method. One of these complexities is estimating the microtunnel boring machine (MTBM) penetration rate due to the complex nature of the interactions between the MTBM and the ground. In the present study, a novel mechanistic approach based on the theory of contact mechanics is proposed to determine the underlying mechanics of the MTBM penetration rate. Using the proposed mechanistic approach, an analytical model of the MTBM penetration rate is developed, and a mechanistic relationship between the MTBM penetration rate and its influential factors, namely soil properties, operational loads, and cutterhead characteristics, is established. The proposed approach is expected to provide substantial mechanistic insight with respect to MTBM penetration rates by (1) modeling penetration rates of MTBMs into soils, (2) identifying the factors that influence penetration rates based on a fundamental theoretical approach, and (3) providing a useful tool for evaluating MTBM penetration rates based on the combined influences of ground properties, operational loads, and cutterhead characteristics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据