4.7 Article

An asymptotic preserving scheme for capturing concentrations in age-structured models arising in adaptive dynamics

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS
卷 464, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111335

关键词

Age-structured population dynamics; Renewal equation; Dirac concentration; Asymptotic preserving scheme; Hamilton-Jacobi equation; Finite difference method

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [740623]
  2. INRIA Paris PRE 2017 MaCED

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduces an asymptotic preserving (A-P) scheme for a population model structured by age and a phenotypical trait, demonstrating the accuracy and numerical resolution capability of the scheme. The scheme exhibits the A-P property and is applicable even in cases with mutations.
We propose an asymptotic preserving (A-P) scheme for a population model structured by age and a phenotypical trait with or without mutations. As proved in [26], Dirac concentrations on particular phenotypical traits appear in the case without mutations, which makes the numerical resolution of the problem challenging. Inspired by its asymptotic behaviour, we apply a proper Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin (WKB) representation of the solution to derive an A-P scheme, with which we can accurately capture the concentrations on a coarse, epsilon-independent mesh. The scheme is thoroughly analysed and important properties, including the A-P property, are rigorously proved. Furthermore, we observe nearly spectral accuracy in time in our numerical simulations. Next, we generalize the A-P scheme to the case with mutations, where a nonlinear Hamilton-Jacobi equation will be involved in the limiting model as epsilon -> 0. It can be formally shown that the generalized scheme is A-P as well, and numerical experiments indicate that we can still accurately solve the problem on a coarse, epsilon-independent mesh in the phenotype space. (c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据