4.1 Article

Dental and Temporomandibular Joint Pathology of the Steller Sea Lion (Eumetopias jubatus)

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PATHOLOGY
卷 199, 期 -, 页码 23-36

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2022.09.002

关键词

dental pathology; Eumetopias jubatus; Steller sea lion; temporomandibular joint pathology

资金

  1. Faculty Discretionary Funds of FJM Verstraete
  2. B Arzi, University of California, Davis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Through examining the skulls of Steller sea lions, it was found that adults had more dental issues and temporomandibular joint problems than young adults, which could play a significant role in their health and survival.
Skulls from 112 Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) were examined according to predefined criteria. Of the specimens, 73 (65.2%) were from males, 29 (25.9%) from females and 10 (8.9%) were of unknown sex, with 50 adults (44.6%), 61 young adults (54.5%) and one of unknown age (0.9%). The number of teeth evaluated was 3,521. Adults had more acquired tooth loss than young adults (P <0.0001). A total of 1,660 teeth (47.1%) from 111 specimens (99.1%) had evidence of attrition or abrasion. Adults displayed more attrition or abrasion than young adults (P <0.0001). A total of 241 teeth (6.8%) from 47 specimens (42%) had tooth fractures. Adults had more fractured teeth than young adults (P <0.0001). Bony changes consistent with periodontitis affected 36.7% of teeth. Adults had more teeth affected by periodontitis than young adults (P <0.0001). Temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis lesions were found in 54 specimens (48.2%) with more in adults than in young adults (P <0.0001). Although the significance of our findings is unknown, the occurrence and severity of these lesions may play an important role in the morbidity and mortality of Steller sea lions. (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据