4.7 Article

Iron-nickel alloy nanoparticles encapsulated in nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes as efficient bifunctional electrocatalyst for rechargeable zinc- air batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 625, 期 -, 页码 278-288

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.06.042

关键词

Iron-nickel alloy; Nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes; Bifunctional electrocatalysts; Zinc-air batteries

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [52173207]
  2. Construct Program of the Key Discipline in Hunan Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, a bifunctional electrocatalyst FeNi-NCNT is proposed for zinc-air batteries. The catalyst demonstrates excellent activity and long cycle life, making it suitable for the production of rechargeable zinc-air batteries with high specific capacity and good performance.
In this work, we present an efficient bifunctional electrocatalyst comprising iron-nickel (FeNi) alloy nanoparticles confined in nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes (denoted FeNi-NCNT) for zinc-air batteries. The FeNi-NCNT electrocatalyst is fabricated by anion-exchange of nickel(II) ion/zinc(II) ion-2,4,6-tris-(di (pyridin-2-yl)amino)-1,3,5-triazine complex with ferricyanide anion followed by mixing with melamine and then carbonization. The resultant FeNi-NCNT electrocatalyst displays excellent bifunctional activity with a low reversible oxygen electrode index of 0.725 V. The rechargeable aqueous zinc-air battery fabricated with FeNi-NCNT air cathode manifests both high specific capacity (819 mAh g(-1) Zn at 5.0 mA cm(-2)) and long cycle life (1500 cycles/1000 h at 10 mA cm(-2), 600 cycles/400 h at 25 mA cm(-2), and 165 cycles/110 h at 50 mA cm(-2)). Moreover, flexible solid-state zinc-air battery assembled with FeNi-NCNT air cathode can deliver a specific capacity of 765 mAh g(-1 )Zn at 5.0 mA cm(-2), a power density of 84.8 mW cm(-2), and a cycle life of 110 h (330 cycles) at 2.0 mA cm(-2). (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据