4.7 Article

Highly stable and low-temperature-tolerant zinc ion storage enabled by carbitol electrolyte additive engineering

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 631, 期 -, 页码 17-24

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.10.127

关键词

Zn ion hybrid supercapacitor; Carbitol; Solvation structure; Electrolyte additive engineering; Low -temperature performances

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbitol additive is introduced to enhance cycling stability and temperature adaptability of aqueous zinc-ion energy storage system by optimizing the coordination structure of zinc ion. The modified electrolyte restrains hydrogen evolution, promotes high-orientation zinc deposition, and limits zinc dendrite growth, leading to long-term cycle stability and stable reversible capacitance for zinc-ion hybrid supercapacitors at different temperatures.
Aqueous zinc (Zn)-ion energy storage system is widely regarded as a promising candidate for future elec-trochemical energy storage applications but suffers insufficient lifespan and limited operating tempera-ture. To address these issues, we introduce a carbitol additive for a novel hybrid electrolyte to enhance cycling stability and temperature adaptability by optimizing the coordination structure of Zn ion. The modified electrolyte not only restrains the hydrogen evolution, but also promotes a high-orientation Zn deposition and significantly limits the Zn dendrite growth. Taking advantage of improved electrolyte properties, the Zn symmetric cells with 10 % carbitol-modified electrolyte exhibit long-term cycle stabil-ity for 5000 h at 25 degrees C, and 400 h at-10 degrees C. More notably, the carbitol-modified electrolyte endows a stable reversible capacitance for Zn ion hybrid supercapacitors to be operated at different temperatures. Our work affords a reasonable electrolyte engineering strategy to fabricate a highly stable and low -temperature-tolerant Zn ion storage system.(c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据