4.7 Article

Homogeneous interfacial water structure favors realizing a low-friction coefficient state

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 626, 期 -, 页码 324-333

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.06.157

关键词

Underwater friction; Intermolecular and surface forces; Interfacial water structures

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51922058, 21925302, 21873090]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study utilizes SFG spectroscopy and AFM to investigate the effect of wetting on underwater friction and finds that a homogeneous interfacial water structure is crucial for achieving low friction.
Hypothesis: The use of water to reduce friction has always played a significant role in a wide range of areas ranging from biology to engineering. Many efforts have been made to extensively investigate the water behavior between two contacted surfaces, but its role in water-based friction remains incompletely understood. Experiments: Herein, we utilize the sum-frequency generation (SFG) spectroscopy to identify interfacial water structures upon adjusting the wettability of titanium dioxide (TiO2) and silicon surfaces. And the corresponding wettability-tunable underwater friction is measured by atomic force microscopy (AFM). Findings: It demonstrates that enhanced wettability induces higher friction on the TiO2 surface but lower friction on the silicon surface. Although the tribological properties of TiO2 show independence of surface forces in contrast to the case of silicon, both TiO2 and silicon surfaces covered with homogeneous water molecules correspond to a lower friction coefficient. This observation indicates that a homogeneous interfacial water structure, dominating over surface forces, is of the utmost importance for achieving low friction. Our results shed new light on the origins of friction in the presence of water and reveal the ubiquitous role of interfacial water structures on friction. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据