4.7 Article

The COVID-19 pandemic and energy transitions: Evidence from low-carbon power generation in China

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 368, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132994

关键词

The COVID-19 pandemic; Low-carbon power generation; Energy transition; China

资金

  1. National Social Science Foundation of China [19CJY021, 71873097, 72174056, 72174151]
  2. Youth Academic Team in Humanities and Social Sciences of Wuhan University [4103-413100001]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [413000363]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The COVID-19 pandemic has increased low-carbon power generation in China, primarily driven by solar and wind power generation. This public health crisis has accelerated the transition of power and energy generation from carbon-intensive sources to modern renewables, suggesting important policy implications.
The Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to a decline in carbon emissions or an improvement in air quality. Yet little is known about how the pandemic has affected the low-carbon energy transition. Here, using difference-in-differences (DID) models with historical controls, this study analyzed the overall impact of COVID-19 on China's low-carbon power generation and examined the COVID-19 effect on the direction of the energy transition with a monthly province-specific, source-specific dataset. It was found that the COVID-19 pandemic increased the low-carbon power generation by 4.59% (0.0648 billion kWh), mainly driven by solar and wind power generation, especially solar power generation. Heterogeneous effects indicate that the pandemic has accelerated the transition of the power generation mix and the primary energy mix from carbon-intensive energy to modern renewables (such as solar and wind power). Finally, this study put forward several policy implications, including the need to promote the long-term development of renewables, green recovery, and so on.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据