4.7 Article

Methodology for setting corporate sustainability targets

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 369, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133359

关键词

Corporate sustainability; ESG; Sustainable development goals (SDG); Quantitative methods

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Setting realistic and challenging sustainability targets is crucial for motivating business plan changes and guiding corporations towards meaningful contributions to sustainable development goals. However, there are limited tools available for setting such targets, and most of them are theme-specific. This paper proposes a thematic-constraint-free methodology for setting corporate sustainability targets and presents a case study on energy and water consumption targets for a Brazilian electricity company and its business units.
Setting realistic but challenging sustainability targets is critical for motivating business plan changes and guiding corporations toward meaningful contributions to sustainable development and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, aside from the conceptual barriers to sustainability, as well as its uni-versalization and materialization, which make defining sustainability targets difficult, there are few tools for setting such targets, and those that do exist are usually theme-specific. Therefore, this paper proposes a meth-odology for setting corporate sustainability targets that is free of thematic constraints and based on the inte-gration of Operational Research methods Data Envelopment Analysis, cluster analysis, time series forecasting, and Goal Programming. An application for defining energy and water consumption targets related to SDGs 6, 7, 8, and 12 is presented for a Brazilian electricity company and its nine business units. As a result, more challenging-yet-achievable targets were set for the company and its business units based on data, benchmarking, and the assessment of its decision-makers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据