4.7 Article

Energy and carbon footprint analysis of municipal wastewater treatment process integrated with food waste disposer

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 375, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134063

关键词

Food waste; Sewage treatment system; Aeration efficiency; Greenhouse gas emission; Food waste disposer

资金

  1. Hong Kong Drainage Services Department [ST1/LS/10/2018]
  2. General Research Fund from the Hong Kong Research Grant Council [RGC/GRF 15212319]
  3. Environment and Conservation Fund [ECF 102/2021]
  4. Seed Fund Scheme of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Joint Laboratory for Environmental Pollution and Control
  5. Research Institute for Future Food (RIFF) of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University [1-CD53]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Household food waste management is an emerging environmental issue impacting sustainable urban development. In-sink domestic food waste disposers have gained attention for their simplified waste handling and reduced household expenses. However, mixing food waste in the sewer system may lead to lower aeration efficiency and increased greenhouse gas emissions during wastewater treatment processes.
Household food waste (FW) management has become an emerging environmental issue affecting sustainable urban development. The application of in-sink domestic food waste disposers (FWDs) have brought significant public attentions due to its simplified waste handling process and reduced household expenses. However, the potentail negative impacts of mixing FW in the sewer system, i.e., the reduction of aeration efficiency in wastewater treatment processes (WWTPs) and corresponding increase of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission, has not been quantified. In this study, real-time oxygen transfer efficiency in processing water was measured in WWTPs receiving negligible amount of FW and compared with those receiving sewage combined with FWD effluent. WWTP receiving sewage with FW had 6-10% lower oxygen transfer rate than those without FW, resulting in extra energy consumptions of 0.25-0.30 kWh/m3 and GHG emissions of 0.35-0.41 kg CO2/m3. For estimating the substantial impacts of FWD to the carbon cycle, sludge treatment scenarios were designed among anaerobic digestion (AD), incineration, and direct landfill disposal. Compared with AD ( 0.07 kWh/kg) and incineration (0.112 kWh/kg), FWD/WWTP consumed more energy (0.69-0.9 kWh/kg) and most of which (similar to 64%) was required by aeration. The operating costs of WWTPs also increased by 1.6-2.1 times in comparison with those did not receive FW. The application of FWD, however, could reduce the overall GHG emissions by 35.2% in comparison with direct landfilling. Decision-makers should guide householders and waste management practitioners through new policies such as carbon credits and/or waste charging scheme to support more environmentalfriendly disposal methods of FW, especally when the maturity of socio-economic conditions are of concerns. Compared with AD and incineration, FWD may be a compromising alternative to control GHG emissions with existing wastewater treatment facilities especially to those regions where complete FW classification and treatment are not well-established.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据