4.7 Review

Feasibility analysis of energy system optimization for a typical manufacturing factory with environmental and economic assessments

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 366, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132887

关键词

Waste-to-energy; Solar-assisted heat pump; Industry energy system; Feasibility analysis

资金

  1. Environment Research and Technology Development Fund of Japan [3-1905, 1-1801]
  2. Environment Research and Technology Development Fund [JPMEERF20193005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzes the cost-effectiveness of heat supply scenarios for a typical manufacturing industry, finding that waste incineration has a more outstanding performance in reducing CO2 emissions and lowering costs compared to solar energy supply scenarios. Additionally, different solar energy supply scenarios show variations in the reduction of CO2 emissions and cost benefits.
To reduce fossil-fuel consumption and improve the efficiency of renewable energy usage in the manufacturing industry, several studies have investigated the environmental and economic impacts of integrated energy systems under various optimization scenarios. To analyze the cost-effectiveness of heat supply scenarios for a typical manufacturing industry using the photovoltaic (PV) technology and municipal solid waste incineration, herein, a metal-assembly paint factory was selected as the research target. The CO2 emission and energy-consumption cost of a paint factory in 24 h are estimated as 31,229 kg and 12,314 CNY, respectively. Solar-to-Energy (StE (a-d)) and Waste-to-Energy (WtE) correspond to the nonenergy-storage, heat-storage, PV power-storage, PV technology's green power-procurement, and waste-incineration district heating scenarios, respectively. The results show that (1) under the nonenergy storage (StE(a)) scenario, the emissions of the paint factory can be reduced by 288 kg/24 h; however, the operation cost is increased by 1142 CNY/24 h (2) StE(b) has a better economic performance (cost reduction by 2472 CNY/24 h) than StE(c) (cost increased by 1546 CNY/24 h). Additionally, the reduction in the CO2 emissions in StE(b) (12,057 kg/24 h) is considerably higher than that of StE(c) (7644 kg/24 h). (3) In the case of sufficient energy supply, StE(d) (24,361 kg/24 h) reduces CO2 emissions more effectively, followed by WtE (CO2-emission reduction = 17,994 kg/24 h), than the other scenarios (for a paint factory). However, from the perspective of cost reduction, WtE showed to have a more outstanding performance (cost reduction 1428 CNY/24 h).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据