4.7 Article

Is the digital economy driving clean energy development? -New evidence from 276 cities in China

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 372, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133783

关键词

Digital economy; Clean energy development; Spatial effect

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the relationship between the digital economy and clean energy, as well as its spatial effects. The findings indicate that the digital economy can drive clean energy development, with market-driven approaches amplifying its positive effects. Additionally, the effects of the digital economy vary across regions, and it can indirectly impact neighboring cities' clean energy development.
The digital economy is becoming increasingly important in the field of carbon governance. However, there is little literature examining the relationship between the digital economy and clean energy development. This paper aims to fill this gap by exploring the relationship between the digital economy and clean energy and its spatial effects. We explored the effects of the digital economy using adouble fixed effects model and a spatial econometric model using 276 cities in China from 2011 to 2019 as the original data. We find that the digital economy can drive clean energy development. Technological innovation and city bank loans play an important mediating role in this. Second, we find that market-driven amplifies the positive effects of the digital economy compared with government intervention, and the effects of the digital economy are different under different regions. Finally, we find that the digital economy can drive clean energy not only in local cities, but also indirectly in neighboring cities. These facts suggest that the digital economy is an important way to drive clean energy development and thus effectively achieve sustainable development. Our study provides new ideas for building digital economy and clean energy development in emerging developing countries such as China.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据