4.7 Article

Assessment of the Second-Order Statically Screened Exchange Correction to the Random Phase Approximation for Correlation Energies

期刊

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00366

关键词

-

资金

  1. The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [731.017.417]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasing interelectronic distance leads to the dominant source of electron correlation being the screening of electron-electron interaction. The random phase approximation (RPA) is a promising method for calculating weak interactions. The addition of second-order screened exchange (SOSEX) to the correlation energy substantially reduces errors and overestimated total correlation energies. The statically screened variant (SOSEX(W(0), W(0))) shows good agreement with SOSEX(W, v(c)), offering significant improvements over RPA for charged excitations and noncovalent interactions.
With increasing interelectronic distance, the screening of the electron-electron interaction by the presence of other electrons becomes the dominant source of electron correlation. This effect is described by the random phase approximation (RPA) which is therefore a promising method for the calculation of weak interactions. The success of the RPA relies on the cancellation of errors, which can be traced back to the violation of the crossing symmetry of the 4-point vertex, leading to strongly overestimated total correlation energies. By the addition of second-order screened exchange (SOSEX) to the correlation energy, this issue is substantially reduced. In the adiabatic connection (AC) SOSEX formalism, one of the two electron-electron interaction lines in the second-order exchange term is dynamically screened (SOSEX(W, v(c))). A related SOSEX expression in which both electron-electron interaction lines are statically screened (SOSEX(W(0), W(0))) is obtained from the G3W2 contribution to the electronic self energy. In contrast to SOSEX(W, v(c)), the evaluation of this correlation energy expression does not require an expensive numerical frequency integration and is therefore advantageous from a computational perspective. We compare the accuracy of the statically screened variant to RPA and RPA+SOSEX(W, v(c)) for a wide range of chemical reactions. While both methods fail for barrier heights, SOSEX(W(0), W(0)) agrees very well with SOSEX(W, v(c)) for charged excitations and noncovalent interactions where they lead to major improvements over RPA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据