4.7 Article

Exact constraints and appropriate norms in machine-learned exchange-correlation functionals

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 157, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0111183

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. DOE, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0019350]
  2. Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence scheme [262695]
  3. European Research Council [772259]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [772259] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
  5. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0019350] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study designs a deep neural network using machine learning techniques to replicate strongly constrained and appropriately normed functional by only using electron density and local derivative information. The experimental results demonstrate that this machine learning approach shows good performance and transferability in molecular and periodic systems.
Machine learning techniques have received growing attention as an alternative strategy for developing general-purpose density functional approximations, augmenting the historically successful approach of human-designed functionals derived to obey mathematical constraints known for the exact exchange-correlation functional. More recently, efforts have been made to reconcile the two techniques, integrating machine learning and exact-constraint satisfaction. We continue this integrated approach, designing a deep neural network that exploits the exact constraint and appropriate norm philosophy to de-orbitalize the strongly constrained and appropriately normed (SCAN) functional. The deep neural network is trained to replicate the SCAN functional from only electron density and local derivative information, avoiding the use of the orbital-dependent kinetic energy density. The performance and transferability of the machine-learned functional are demonstrated for molecular and periodic systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据