4.7 Article

Free energy landscape within the hysteresis regime for fluids confined in disordered mesoporous solids

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 157, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0107333

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Science Foundation (DFG) [411771259]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adsorption/desorption and melting/freezing in structurally disordered nanoporous solids exhibit strongly non-equilibrium behavior. However, many questions related to the free energy spectrum, existence and accessibility of equilibrium transitions, and relaxation dynamics towards the global energy minimum, still remain poorly addressed. In this study, a minimal model of pore networks with statistical disorder is used to explore the system free energies along solid-liquid and liquid-gas transitions. The rigorous results obtained provide insights into the equilibrium transition line in porous solids with arbitrary pore topology.
Adsorption/desorption and melting/freezing in structurally disordered nanoporous solids exhibit strongly non-equilibrium behavior as revealed by the formation of a hysteresis region populated by the multitude of different states. Many questions concerning the free energy spectrum of these states, including the existence of the equilibrium transition, if any, their accessibility in the experiments, and internal relaxation dynamics toward the global energy minimum, still remain poorly addressed. By using a serially connected pore model with the statistical disorder as a minimal model of the pore networks, we explore the system free energies along the solid-liquid and liquid-gas transitions in the pore systems. The rigorous results obtained with this model shed light on the occurrence and nature of the equilibrium transition line in porous solids with arbitrary pore topology. We discuss further the free energies along the experimentally measured boundary and scanning transitions and how close the equilibrium states can be approached in these experiments. (C) 2022 Author(s).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据