4.7 Article

Cluster Analysis in Liquids: A Novel Tool in TRAVIS

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01244

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [5494/1-3]
  2. DFG
  3. International Max Planck Research School on Reactive Structure Analysis for Chemical Reactions (IMPRS-RECHARGE)
  4. [406232243]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We introduce a novel cluster analysis implemented in our open-source software TRAVIS, and its application to realistic and complex chemical systems. The cluster analysis algorithm solely relies on atom distances and demonstrates size-independence as well as universality in the clustering behavior of pure water in both classical and ab initio molecular dynamics simulations. The cluster analysis is also successfully applied to analyze the clustering of individual components and mixture of [C2C1Im][OAc] ionic liquid with water.
We present a novel cluster analysis implemented in our open-source software TRAVIS and its application to realistic and complex chemical systems. The underlying algorithm is exclusively based on atom distances. Using a two-dimensional model system, we first introduce different cluster analysis functions and their application to single snapshots and trajectories including periodicity and temporal propagation. Using molecular dynamics simulations of pure water with varying system size, we show that our cluster analysis is size-independent. Furthermore, we observe a similar clustering behavior of pure water in classical and ab initio molecular dynamics simulations, showing that our cluster analysis is universal. In order to emphasize the application to more complex systems and mixtures, we additionally apply the cluster analysis to ab initio molecular dynamics simulations of the [C2C1Im][OAc] ionic liquid and its mixture with water. Using that, we show that our cluster analysis is able to analyze the clustering of the individual components in a mixture as well as the clustering of the ionic liquid with water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据