4.5 Article

A Problem-Based Approach to Teaching the Internal Standard Method by ATR-FTIR Spectroscopy

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION
卷 99, 期 11, 页码 3735-3746

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00548

关键词

Upper-Division Undergraduate; Analytical Chemistry; Curriculum; Laboratory Instruction; Problem Solving; Decision Making; IR Spectroscopy; Quantitative Analysis; Student-Centered Learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this laboratory experiment, students quantitatively analyze both liquid and solid samples using the internal standard method and ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. Through problem-based selection of internal standards, students gain a deeper understanding of calibration and standard selection. The experiment provides students an opportunity to explore quantitative analysis within the context of quality control and assurance.
The ability of students to perform quantitative analysis is a fundamental aspect of analytical chemistry courses and laboratories. In this laboratory experiment, students quantitatively analyze both liquid and solid samples through the use of internal standard calibration and ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. Using a problem -based approach to selecting their internal standards, students gain a deeper understanding of the internal standard method of calibration and the process of selecting appropriate standards for the analysis of sodium benzoate and acetophenone. This experiment allows students to explore the internal standard method of calibration under a wider context of quality control and quality assurance as they frame their quantitative analyses through both internal and external quality assurance testing methods. In a survey of students undertaking this experiment, most students responded that the experiment provided them with a better understanding of the internal standard method of calibration, and the selection of internal standards, and offered them an opportunity to gain hands-on experience with ATR-FTIR spectroscopy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据